# WorkflowGen v5.0.33

**URL:** <https://discuss.workflowgen.com/t/workflowgen-v5-0-33/527>\
**Category:** Release Notes & Downloads\
**Created:** [October 16, 2007, 5:25am UTC](https://discuss.workflowgen.com/t/workflowgen-v5-0-33/527 "2007-10-16T05:25:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wfg-admin](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/discuss.workflowgen.com/wfg-admin/32/714_2.png) [@wfg-admin](https://discuss.workflowgen.com/u/wfg-admin)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2007, 5:25am UTC](https://discuss.workflowgen.com/t/workflowgen-v5-0-33/527/1 "2007-10-16T05:25:05Z")

</div>

#### Version 5.x support ends June 30, 2017

Support and maintenance for version 5.x will end on **June 30, 2017**. If you are still running version 5, we recommend you plan a migration, and we will be happy to help should you need any assistance.

**Portal**

- #2213: BUG - An exception was raised when searching requests with a TEXT process data filter in Oracle.
- #2132: BUG - Exclusive access control issue when two users are launching the same action at the same moment.
- #2220: BUG - An exception error was raised when completing a request without the “Archive action associated data” and with at least one process data in read-only used as an action parameter.
- #2224: BUG - A JavaScript syntax error was raised in the portal and admin module when used with the language German (Switzerland).

**Administration**

- #2134: BUG - Lists CSS styles were not maintained when navigating with the browsers Back and Forward buttons.
- #2137: BUG - An exception was raised when changing process participant or data display order after item deletion.
- #2208: BUG - Process participant supervisor permissions were lost when importing a process XPDL.
- #2211: BUG - Configuration panel access validation on theusername is now case insensitive.
- #2217: BUG - A JavaScript error was raised when adding many groups to a participant.
- #2222: BUG - Global and process participant unique record error message is now more clear.
